Skip to content
MIT license
Profile icon
AS4

Why is all Content published to a public repl or a Classroom are automatically published with an MIT license?

You are viewing a single comment. View All
Profile icon
Mooopy

I'm not an expert on this but I believe it's because, the MIT License basically lets you do whatever you want with whatever it is licensing, not really any restrictions. A software license determines how the software can be reused. Because people are forking the stuff, etc. it really shouldn't be anything else, or it would probably technically be illegal for people to fork your repls
Like, Microsoft's software like Word, etc. probably have pretty restrictive licenses since they want you to buy it and it's not an open source free thing like all repls are. All repls are open source really, unless you private them, and they should always be free, so an MIT License is the best way to go
TLDR: The MIT License is used for open source software, and since all repls are open source, the MIT License is put on them, making them officially open source.

Profile icon
AS4

@Mooopy
But what if you want to show your repl.it whilst remaining the copyright of them?

Profile icon
amasad

@AS4
MIT doesn't mean that you don't have a copyright to it -- it dictates how others can use it and modify it.

Profile icon
amasad

@AS4
how would you license it? If that's an important feature we might make it so that you can customize the license

Profile icon
AS4

@amasad
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Gives the right to share the code. No adaptations allowed. No warranty. No commercial use.